Jaw.kr
   
³»¿ë¾øÀ½9
³»¿ë¾øÀ½10

ȸ¿øµî·Ï £ü ºñ¹øºÐ½Ç
ÀÚ·á½Ç


 publication
°ÔÀç ³í¹®
°­³²¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú¿¡¼­ ³ª°£ ³í¹®µéÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¤ýÀÛ¼ºÀÚ jaw
¤ýÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2018-07-05 (¸ñ) 19:33
¤ýºÐ ·ù ±¹¿Ü(SCI)
¤ýÇÐȸÁö OOOOE
¤ý¿¬µµ 2018
¤ý±Ç(È£¼ö) 125(6)
¤ýÁ¦1ÀúÀÚ Kim JY
¤ý±³½ÅÀúÀÚ Huh JK
¤ýÁ¶È¸: 1469  
A nomogram for classification of temporomandibular joint disk perforation based on magnetic resonance imaging
A nomogram for classification of temporomandibular joint disk perforation based on magnetic resonance imaging
Jae-Young Kim, DDS, PhD,a Kug-Jin Jeon, DDS, PhD,b Myeong-Gyun Kim, DDS,a Kwang-Ho Park, DDS, MSD,a and Jong-Ki Huh, DDS, PhDa

Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors and establish a prediction model for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk perforation by constructing a nomogram.

Study Design. The study included a total of 282 joints in 274 patients. All patients underwent open TMJ surgery after obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), from 2005 to 2015. The presence or absence of disk perforation was confirmed during the operation. Patients were classified into 2 groups: perforation and nonperforation groups. We investigated demographic data and the characteristics of the disk, joint space, and bone on MRI. A logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze risk factors. A nomogram was constructed and validated internally and externally.

Results. Risk factors for disk perforation were increased age, disk shape (eyeglass or amorphous), low bone marrow signal, abnormal joint space, and 2 or more bony changes in the condyle and fossa. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram was 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.869-0.946) in the internal validation and 0.889 (95% CI 0.804-0.973) in the external validation with good suitability.

Conclusions. We were able to predict the probability of disk perforation with analyzed risk factors and constructed a nomogram, which may be helpful in proper diagnosis and treatment. 

(Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018;125:682–692)
   
  0
3500
 
¹øÈ£     ±Û Á¦ ¸ñ ÇÐȸÁö ¿¬µµ ±Ç(È£¼ö) Á¦1ÀúÀÚ ±³½ÅÀúÀÚ Á¶È¸
146 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Orthognathic surgery of temporomandibular disorder.. ´ë±¸¿ÜÁö 2021 47(2) ÇãÁ¾±â ÇãÁ¾±â 5316
145 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) Using deep learning to predict temporomandibular j.. ÇØ¿Ü±âŸ 2021 11(1) ±èÀ翵 ±èµ¿¿í ÇãÁ¾±â 8523
144 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) Three-dimensional assessment of the anterior and i.. ÇØ¿Ü±âŸ 2021 21(1) ±èÀ翵 ¹Ú±¤È£ 7999
143 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) Craniofacial and dental injuries associated with s.. ÇØ¿Ü±âŸ 2021 ±è¹Î½Ä ±èÀ翵 6321
142 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) Is There a Difference in Condyle Position Changing.. JOMS 2020 78(4) ±èÀ翵 ¹Ú±¤È£ 9820
141 ±¹³»(SCI) ¸é¿ª¾ïÁ¦Á¦ º¹¿ë ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÑ .. ±¹³»±âŸ 2019 23(4) ±è´ëÈÆ ÇãÁ¾±â 1050
140 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation o.. ¾Ç¼ºÇÐȸÁö 2019 41(1) ÃÖÈ¿¿ø ¹Ú±¤È£ 3003
139 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Modified difficult index adding extremely difficul.. ´ë±¸¿ÜÁö 2019 45 ±èÀ翵 ÇãÁ¾±â 1672
138 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Septic Art.. ±¹³»±âŸ 2019 44(3) ±èº¸¶ó ÇãÁ¾±â 3610
137 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) Clinical and microbiologic investigation of an exp.. ÇØ¿Ü±âŸ 2019 19(1) Seong WJ Seong WJ 15962
136 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Effect of initial placement level and wall thickne.. ±¹³»±âŸ 2019 49(3) Yoo JH Lee DW 9619
135 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Effect of bisphosphonate on temporomandibular join.. ¾Ç¼ºÇÐȸÁö 2019 41(1) Kim JY Huh JK 3159
134 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) The relationship between oral tori and bite force... ÇØ¿Ü±âŸ 2019 37(4) Jeong CW Huh JK 8651
133 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Three-dimensional analysis of the anterior loop of.. ¾Ç¼ºÇÐȸÁö 2018 40(1) Yoon S Park KH 6247
132 ±¹³»(ÇÐÁø) Subcutaneous emphysema related to dental procedure.. ´ë±¸¿ÜÁö 2018 44(5) Á¤Ã¶Èñ ÇãÁ¾±â 8740
131 ±¹¿Ü(SCI) A nomogram for classification of temporomandibular.. OOOOE 2018 125(6) Kim JY Huh JK 1469
12345678910

       ¼­¿ï½Ã °­³²±¸ ¾ðÁÖ·Î 211 °­³²¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
   GSOMS v.1 (YDOMS v.3) since 2000